blog comments powered by Disqus Sign up for our newsletters! Supreme Court to order the state to reduce its prison population. Prop 57 focuses on evidence-based rehabilitation and allows a juvenile court judge to decide whether or not a minor should be prosecuted as an adult. Verbatim fact check: Does an increase in the number of propositions on the ballot in California lead to more of those propositions being rejected by voters?We examined the election results for
How about a 50‐year old child molester who preys on a child? It won with 65 percent of the vote. An estimated quarter of California’s nearly 130,000 prison inmates could seek earlier parole under the measure. Click here to check out this week's edition.
David Eyster Merced County District Attorney Larry Morse Modoc County District Attorney Jordan Funk Mono County District Attorney Tim Kendall Monterey County District Attorney Dean Flippo Napa County District Attorney Gary It fails to specify some offenses -- arson, hostage taking -- that should make convicts ineligible for consideration. Proposition 57 will allow inmates to seek earlier parole hearings unless they have been convicted of about two dozen crimes classified as violent.
Its strongest support came from urban areas with a sizeable number of Democratic voters. Crime Victims, Police, Sheriffs, Judges and Prosecutors urge a NO vote on 57. Overcrowded and unconstitutional conditions led the U.S. County Professional Peace Officers' Assn.
Travis Allen (R-72) Rep. Lawsuit Lawsuit overviewIssue: Removal of initiative from the ballot due to allegedly illegal unrelated amendments to initiative textCourt: Filed in Sacramento County Superior Court; appealed to California Supreme CourtRuling: Ultimately ruled Gov. Requires the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to certify that these policies are consistent with protecting and enhancing public safety.
Brown said the changes in Proposition 57 are needed to keep the state’s prison population below the level set by federal judges. Brian Dahle (R-1) Rep. On February 26, 2016, the appeal was initially decided in favor of initiative proponents, at least temporarily overturning the original court decision. The Times urges voters to read it, understand it, and vote 'yes.' ...
America’s largest state in terms of population remains in many ways a great success story. http://www.stop57.com/ It's a good idea, but the details matter. Provides juvenile court judge decides whether juvenile will be prosecuted as adult. Please log in to continue.
Jerry Brown to rid the state of its inconvenient prison population by turning prisoners loose on the public." Santa Rosa Press Democrat: "The net effect, law enforcement officials contend, is that Reformers say all this can be fixed when regulations are written to implement the law, but that's asking voters to take too much on faith. Most California district attorneys oppose Prop. 57 because its definition of violent crimes is far too narrow. Fiscal Impact: Net state savings likely in the tens of millions of dollars annually, depending on implementation.
California has to find more ways to reduce prison overcrowding and costs. The supreme court ultimately ruled in favor of the initiative petitioners, allowing them to continue to permanently move forward with the initiative and qualify it for the ballot. Jerry Brown's Proposition 57 isn't crafted well enough to merit voter support. (Rich Pedroncelli/Associated Press) By Mercury News Editorial Board PUBLISHED: September 23, 2016 at 10:28 am | UPDATED: September 28, It is home to some of the world’s most creative people and industries, but for five years it posted one of the nation’s highest unemployment rates.
Chang stated that “the attorney general abused her discretion” by approving the amendments to Proposition 57, agreeing with plaintiffs that the changes significantly altered the purpose and provisions of the originally Meanwhile, too few inmates were rehabilitated and most re-offended after release. Media editorials Support The Bakersfield Californian: "Prosecutors, law enforcement and correctional officers adamantly opposed Prop. 57.
The proposition would place the new privileges for criminals in the California Constitution, making it more difficult for the legislature to change the language if necessary. Prop. 57 allows violent, dangerous and adult career criminals to be released from prison early, including those convicted of: Rape by intoxication Rape of an unconscious person Human trafficking involving sex act It also muddies the distinction between convicts who are in jail for the same offense, but have vastly different criminal histories. A total of $4,818,267.20 was spent to collect the 585,407 valid signatures required to put this measure before voters, resulting in a total cost per required signature (CPRS) of $8.23.
Brown stated, “One of the key unintended consequences was the removal of incentives for inmates to improve themselves, to refrain from gang activity, using narcotics, otherwise misbehaving. Now, without a common sense, long‐term solution, we will continue to waste billions and risk a court‐ordered release of dangerous prisoners. General ElectionThe measure also strips prosecutors of the power to decide when juveniles should be tried as adults and leaves those decisions to judges. Finally, Prop. 57 places all these new privileges and rights for convicted criminals into the California Constitution, where they cannot be changed by the Legislature.
The lawsuit argued that proponents substantially changed the proposed initiative originally filed with the attorney general through later amendments. Proposition 57 qualified for the November 2016 ballot on June 30, 2016. Cost of signature collection: Sponsors of the measure hired Kimball Petition Management, Inc. Yes, there are risks. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to [email protected] Path to the ballot Voting onCivil and CriminalTrials Ballot Measures By state By
Jerry Brown (D), Mark Bonini, president of the Chief Probation Officers of California, and Dionne Wilson, the widow of a police officer killed in the line of duty, wrote the official The California Supreme Court clearly stated that parole eligibility under Prop. 57 applies, "only to prisoners convicted of non‐violent felonies." (Brown v. Brown’s allies decry this criticism and say of course such criminals would never get early parole. Proposition 57 is seriously lacking important specifics.
To report an error, click here. But Republicans might need a reality check here. Among the states, it has attracted the largest number of immigrants from Mexico, Latin America, and Asia, but it also has seen the largest exodus of citizens to other states. Editorial: Donald Trump and Obamacare's future November 14, 2016, 8:51 am Republicans will be hard-pressed to deliver on their promise to repeal Obamacare and also improve health care.
The United States Supreme Court ruled that California's prisons were overcrowded and violated the Eighth Amendment. Recent news The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Proposition 57California2016. Congress, 2016 U.S. Gov.
Supporters Officials Gov. Prop 57 focuses our system on evidence-based rehabilitation for juveniles and adults because it is better for public safety than our current system.